|
Post by timberwolf on Sept 22, 2021 9:36:09 GMT
No, I think the vast majority of us (on here anyway) see no value in letting Rusk have another game in charge. It helps nobody. To hope for a loss at weekend just to see Rusk leave is a peculiar idea, to me anyway. Whilst a win will paper over any cracks, it is 3 points on the board. Any decision to sack Rusk should be being taken with results as they already are, we're too far gone for reprieves and performance plans. If only there was a good plan B if rusk did get the sack. Apart from JG,s 3 appointments we have never gone forward for 25 years in managerial appointments. Its more frightening actually sacking him than keeping him looking at our past.
|
|
|
Post by stalybridgehatter on Sept 22, 2021 15:12:15 GMT
No, I think the vast majority of us (on here anyway) see no value in letting Rusk have another game in charge. It helps nobody. To hope for a loss at weekend just to see Rusk leave is a peculiar idea, to me anyway. Whilst a win will paper over any cracks, it is 3 points on the board. Any decision to sack Rusk should be being taken with results as they already are, we're too far gone for reprieves and performance plans. If only there was a good plan B if rusk did get the sack. Apart from JG,s 3 appointments we have never gone forward for 25 years in managerial appointments. Its more frightening actually sacking him than keeping him looking at our past. A plan B would be good, as long as the new Plan B isn't to rigorously stick to Plan A ...
|
|